Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40970836›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2025

Profiling RNA G-Quadruplexes In vivo.

Bibo Yang, Yiliang Ding, Yueying Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Profiling RNA G-Quadruplexes In vivo.Current protocols · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bibo YangDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Yiliang DingDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4161-6365
Yueying ZhangDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA G-quadruplexes (RG4s) are specific and complex tertiary structures that form in guanine-rich regions of RNA and can be detected in vitro. A recently developed transcriptome-wide technique, SHALiPE-Seq, enables the assessment of RG4 folding status within living cells in a quantitative manner. This method integrates chemical probing with high-throughput sequencing. SHALiPE-Seq relies on the property of 2-methylnicotinic acid imidazolide (NAI), which preferentially modifies the last guanine in G-tracts when RG4s are folded. To establish reference profiles, in vitro NAI modification patterns are generated under potassium ion (K⁺) conditions, which promote folding, and lithium ion (Li⁺) conditions, which maintain RG4s in an unfolded state. By comparing in vivo SHALiPE-Seq profiles with these in vitro benchmarks, it becomes possible to identify and evaluate the formation of RG4s in living cells. Although this protocol has been applied to Arabidopsis thaliana and rice, SHALiPE-Seq is broadly applicable to other systems and provides a valuable approach for investigating the in vivo dynamics of RG4s and their potential biological functions. © 2025 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: In vitro and in vivo NAI probing of RNA Basic Protocol 2: Construction of the SHALiPE-Seq libraries Basic Protocol 3: Measurement of the RNA G-quadruplex folding status based on SHALiPE-Seq libraries.

Indexed as

G-QuadruplexesRNAArabidopsisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingOryzaRNAG‐quadruplexRNA structure profilingSHALiPE‐Seq

Identifiers

PMID40970836
PMCPMC12447860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.