ArticleRadiology. Imaging cancer2025
Predicting Clinical Success of CT-based Functional Drained Liver Volume Assessment in Malignant Biliary Obstruction.
Article in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To compare the predictive accuracy of subjective versus objective assessment of three-dimensional functional drained liver volume (fDLV) for clinical success after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with malignant biliary obstruction and hyperbilirubinemia who underwent de novo PTBD between January 2016 and February 2017. Clinical success was defined as achieving total bilirubin level less than 1.8 mg/dL (30.8 μmol/L) within 30 days after PTBD. Seven interventional radiologists independently categorized subjective fDLV into four groups: less than 30%, 30%-50%, 51%-75%, and greater than 75% of the total liver volume. Objective fDLV was calculated using imaging software and expressed as volume, percentage, and categorical groups. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Predictive accuracy was analyzed via univariate and multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results This study included 35 consecutive patients (median [IQR], 66 years [57, 71]; 23 men). Clinical success was achieved in 17 of 35 patients (49%). Interobserver agreement for subjective fDLV was low (ICC, 0.29 [95% CI: 0.12, 0.48]). Objective fDLV expressed as volume (odds ratio [OR], 1.34 [95% CI: 1.13, 1.70];
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.