ArticleThe Prostate2026
PROSTest, a Multigene Liquid Biopsy Signature, Effectively Stratifies Patients With High PSA for Prostate Biopsy.
Article in The Prostate, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07454603 (A Single-arm, Multicenter Prospective Study to Evaluate the Diagnostic Performance of PROSTest in Men With PSA ≥ 3ng/ml Using Biopsy as the Sole Ground Truth), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single-arm, Multicenter Prospective Study to Evaluate the Diagnostic Performance of PROSTest in Men With PSA ≥ 3ng/ml Using Biopsy as the Sole Ground Truth
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating Tumor Function: A Systems Biology Framework for Liquid Biopsy in Genitourinary Cancers.Genes · 2026Review
- Article
- Incremental diagnostic value of MRI PI-RADS classification combined with PSA density for prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProstate-specific antigen (PSA) remains the standard biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa) detection, but its limited specificity-particularly in the 3-10 ng/mL range-leads to overdiagnosis and unnecessary biopsies. Including multiparameteric MRI (mpMRI) helps to reduce the number of PSA-false-positive biopsies, but there is still a need for noninvasive diagnostics that improve risk stratification and reduce unnecessary interventions.
methodsPROSTest is a peripheral blood-based assay that quantifies a 27-gene signature in the androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway in addition to 3 housekeeping genes (HKGs). PCR results are fed into a proprietary machine learning (ML) algorithm to produce a numerical score on a scale of 0-100 with a clinically validated cutoff of 50 for a final binary readout; positive or negative for likelihood of cancer on biopsy. In this report, the diagnostic performance of PROSTest was evaluated in 1,894 male subjects including 970 individuals with actionable results (PSA ≥ 3.0 ng/mL). We focused on two PSA-graded intended-use populations: subjects aged ≥ 45 years with PSA 3-10 ng/mL (n = 467), and those with PSA > 10 ng/mL (n = 503). PSA and PROSTest were conducted on all subjects.
resultsIn the 970 cohort, adding the PROSTest achieved an AUC of 0.96 and was significantly more accurate than PSA alone for differentiating PCa from benign prostatic disease (Chi
conclusionsPROSTest demonstrates improved stratification value relative to PSA and could significantly reduce PSA-driven false positive biopsies. Out of 259 non-PCa subjects biopsied based on high PSA levels, applying PROSTest could potentially eliminate 227 biopsies (87.6%). PROSTest superior NPV was not confounded as a tradeoff for the PPV as PROSTest exhibited a sensitivity of ~95% (675/711 PCa detected).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.