Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40970770›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2026

PROSTest, a Multigene Liquid Biopsy Signature, Effectively Stratifies Patients With High PSA for Prostate Biopsy.

Kambiz Rahbar, R David Rosin, Mark Kidd, Abdel B Halim, Oliver Sartor

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07454603 (A Single-arm, Multicenter Prospective Study to Evaluate the Diagnostic Performance of PROSTest in Men With PSA ≥ 3ng/ml Using Biopsy as the Sole Ground Truth), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07454603 recruitingnot on this map

A Single-arm, Multicenter Prospective Study to Evaluate the Diagnostic Performance of PROSTest in Men With PSA ≥ 3ng/ml Using Biopsy as the Sole Ground Truth

TypeobservationalSponsorWren Laboratories LLCRan2026 to 2027Enrolled1,500ConditionsProstate Cancer, Urology, Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis)ArmsPROSTEST
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kambiz RahbarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
R David RosinUniversity of the West Indies & The Barbados Cancer Society, Cave Hill, Barbados.
Mark KiddWren Laboratories, Branford, Connecticut, USA.
Abdel B HalimWren Laboratories, Branford, Connecticut, USA.
Oliver SartorTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate-specific antigen (PSA) remains the standard biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa) detection, but its limited specificity-particularly in the 3-10 ng/mL range-leads to overdiagnosis and unnecessary biopsies. Including multiparameteric MRI (mpMRI) helps to reduce the number of PSA-false-positive biopsies, but there is still a need for noninvasive diagnostics that improve risk stratification and reduce unnecessary interventions.

methodsPROSTest is a peripheral blood-based assay that quantifies a 27-gene signature in the androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway in addition to 3 housekeeping genes (HKGs). PCR results are fed into a proprietary machine learning (ML) algorithm to produce a numerical score on a scale of 0-100 with a clinically validated cutoff of 50 for a final binary readout; positive or negative for likelihood of cancer on biopsy. In this report, the diagnostic performance of PROSTest was evaluated in 1,894 male subjects including 970 individuals with actionable results (PSA ≥ 3.0 ng/mL). We focused on two PSA-graded intended-use populations: subjects aged ≥ 45 years with PSA 3-10 ng/mL (n = 467), and those with PSA > 10 ng/mL (n = 503). PSA and PROSTest were conducted on all subjects.

resultsIn the 970 cohort, adding the PROSTest achieved an AUC of 0.96 and was significantly more accurate than PSA alone for differentiating PCa from benign prostatic disease (Chi

conclusionsPROSTest demonstrates improved stratification value relative to PSA and could significantly reduce PSA-driven false positive biopsies. Out of 259 non-PCa subjects biopsied based on high PSA levels, applying PROSTest could potentially eliminate 227 biopsies (87.6%). PROSTest superior NPV was not confounded as a tradeoff for the PPV as PROSTest exhibited a sensitivity of ~95% (675/711 PCa detected).

Indexed as

ProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific Antigendiagnostic accuracyliquid biopsymultigene mRNA expressionprostate biopsyprostate biopsy stratificationprostate cancer detectionPSA

Identifiers

PMID40970770
PMCPMC12667224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.