ArticleHistopathology2026
A 5-marker immunohistochemical panel of CK17, MEP1A, PAX8, SMAD4, and CDX2 to distinguish ovarian mucinous carcinoma from metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DNA methylation profiling enables subclassification of mucinous ovarian carcinoma and distinguishes it from extraovarian mucinous metastases.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsMetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), albeit uncommon, may involve the ovary, and distinction from primary ovarian mucinous tumours (OMT) poses a diagnostic challenge. Our aim was to develop an ancillary immunohistochemical (IHC) panel to aid in diagnosis and to validate the morphological features of metastatic PDAC. METHODS AND
resultsSix IHC markers (CDX2, CK17, MEP1A, MUC2, PAX8, SMAD4) selected based on a literature review were stained on tissue microarrays containing 256 PDAC, 102 mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MC) and 58 mucinous borderline ovarian tumours (MBOT). Detailed morphological features were reviewed in 16 ovarian metastases from PDAC, 25 MC, and 9 MBOT. We confirmed that tumours with a size less than 13 cm, bilaterality, ovarian surface involvement, low-power nodularity, infiltrative invasion, pseudomyxoma ovarii despite cystadenoma or borderline areas, and moderate nuclear atypia should raise suspicion for metastatic PDAC and prompt evaluation with the recommended IHC panel. A 5-marker panel consisting of CK17, MEP1A, PAX8, SMAD4, and CDX2 had an overall accuracy of 91.8% (95% CI 88.8%-94.3%) using recursive partitioning, with the highest weight resting on CK17. CK17 was expressed in 80.9% of PDAC compared to 18.6% of MC and 1.7% of MBOT, respectively.
conclusionsThis is the first ancillary IHC panel to distinguish between PDAC and OMT with high accuracy. These results inform further studies on diagnostic workflows tailored to the complexity of metastatic presentations of tumours at the ovary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.