Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40970574›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical nursing2026

Stress and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The Mediating Role of Perceived Support and Treatment Adherence.

Rafael Salas-Muriel, Francisco Javier De Santiago-Herrero, María Montfragüe García-Mateos, María Del Sol Fortea Sevilla, Cristina Jenaro, Juan-José Igartua

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rafael Salas-MurielDepartment of Personality, Psychological Assessment and Treatment, School of Psychology, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5764-6406
Francisco Javier De Santiago-HerreroDepartment of Personality, Psychological Assessment and Treatment, School of Psychology, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3366-2855
María Montfragüe García-MateosDepartment of Personality, Psychological Assessment and Treatment, School of Psychology, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6519-6329
María Del Sol Fortea SevillaDepartment of Psychology, Sociology and Social Work, School of Education Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0969-9183
Cristina JenaroDepartment of Personality, Psychological Assessment and Treatment, School of Psychology/INICO, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2060-1658
Juan-José IgartuaDepartment of Sociology and Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9865-2714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo examine the associations among diabetes-related stress, treatment adherence, perceived social support, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), and to explore the mediating roles of support and adherence in this relationship.

designA cross-sectional observational study using self-report standardised measures and mediation analysis.

methodsA total of 772 Spanish adults with DM1 completed validated instruments measuring diabetes-related distress, perceived social support, treatment adherence, and HRQoL. Hierarchical multiple regression and serial mediation analysis (PROCESS Model 6, 10,000 bootstraps) were conducted, controlling for age, sex, and time since diagnosis. DATA SOURCES: Not applicable (primary data collection, not a review).

resultsDiabetes-related stress was the strongest predictor of lower HRQoL. Perceived social support and treatment adherence also contributed significantly. Mediation analyses indicated that the impact of stress on HRQoL was partially mediated by perceived social support and, in sequence, by treatment adherence. The indirect path through social support alone and the sequential path involving both mediators were significant.

conclusionStress and social support are critical in understanding and improving HRQoL in adults with DM1. Treatment adherence appears to be influenced by perceived support, highlighting an indirect mechanism linking stress to quality of life. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Healthcare professionals should integrate psychosocial assessments and interventions into routine diabetes care. Targeting stress reduction and enhancing social support may improve adherence and overall well-being in adults with DM1. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? The study addressed the need to understand how psychosocial factors-specifically stress, perceived social support, and treatment adherence-contribute to HRQoL in adults with DM1. While prior research often focused on paediatric or clinical populations and rarely explored mediation models, this study sought to fill those gaps with data from a large community sample of adults. What were the main findings? The main findings indicate that diabetes-related stress is the most significant predictor of reduced HRQoL. This relationship is partially mediated by perceived social support and, sequentially, by treatment adherence. While stress directly affects HRQoL, its negative impact is also channelled through diminished social support and decreased adherence. The indirect effect through treatment adherence alone was not significant. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research has implications for adults living with DM1, particularly those in community settings outside of clinical supervision. It informs healthcare providers, diabetes educators, and policymakers on the importance of addressing emotional distress and strengthening support networks to improve both treatment adherence and overall quality of life. REPORTING

methodThis study adhered to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines for cross-sectional studies. All methods and results are reported in alignment with EQUATOR Network recommendations for transparent and rigorous research reporting. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The study was conducted in collaboration with the Spanish Diabetes Federation (FEDE), which supported participant recruitment and dissemination through its affiliated associations. Patient input was incorporated throughout the study. A person with lived experience of type 1 diabetes contributed to the conceptual development of the research questions and the interpretation of findings. Their perspective helped ensure that the study design, choice of measures, and implications were relevant and meaningful to people living with the condition. This involvement supported a patient-centred approach to both the research and the manuscript preparation. Patients' participation as voluntary contributors was essential to the data collection process.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Quality of LifeSocial SupportStress, PsychologicalTreatment Adherence and ComplianceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpainSurveys and Questionnairesdiabetes mellitus type 1disease managementhealth‐related quality of lifesocial supportstresstreatment adherence

Identifiers

PMID40970574
PMCPMC12862509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.