ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Dynamic Increase of the C
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The metabolic-inflammatory axis in chronic heart failure: integrating the NLR and TyG index for recent-onset atrial fibrillation prediction via machine learning and mediation analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- The "sentinel stroke": catheter ablation outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation detected after stroke.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF) increases with accumulating risk factors. Baseline-only risk assessment may not reflect the real risk of incident AF. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the dynamic change of the C
methodsThe present study data were retrieved from the Information Management and Big Data Center of Peking University Hospital Group. Patients without AF at baseline were enrolled. New-onset comorbidities were recorded during follow-up. The change in the C
resultsA total of 120 133 patients were included in the final analysis. During 346 400 patient-years of follow-up, 2304 developed incident AF (0.67 per 100 patient-years). The mean C
conclusionsThe risk for incident AF is not static and increases with the accumulation of new comorbidities. The change in C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.