Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40970489›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2025

Disinfection Efficiency Among Black Alder and Hybrid Alder Genotypes and Their Influence on Alder Seed Germination In Vitro.

Vytautas Čėsna, Ieva Čėsnienė, Virgilijus Baliuckas, Jonas Žiauka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vytautas ČėsnaInstitute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8446-0044
Ieva ČėsnienėInstitute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2848-7864
Virgilijus BaliuckasInstitute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4789-3267
Jonas ŽiaukaFaculty of Natural Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2198-901X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presented study aimed to test a set of Alnus genotypes, including hybrids of black and grey alders (A. glutinosa × A. incana) and A. glutinosa, based on their spring phenology, using in vitro screening assays. We evaluated the disinfection efficiency and the susceptibility of the surviving fungi in different Alnus genotypes, comprising five with early spring phenology, four with late spring phenology and four hybrids. Then, the best-performing explants of four Alnus genotypes, including at least one of early and late spring phenology, as well as one hybrid, were selected to evaluate the explant influence on other Alnus seed germination under stress from the fungus Cladosporium cladosporioides inoculum. The explants of Alnus hybrids 047 and 026 were characterised by stronger leaf development than the A. glutinosa genotype 19-43-8 K, which, however, displayed the highest success of explant sterilisation. The explants of A. glutinosa genotype 19-43-8 K and of Alnus hybrid 026 were shown to increase germination of neighbouring (planted in the same test tube) Alnus seeds and seedling development, especially root system expansion under the stress from C. cladosporioides. These results point to the potential of the selected Alnus genotypes to relieve biotic stress in other Alnus seeds.

Indexed as

AlnusCladosporiumDisinfectionGerminationSeedsGenotypePlant DiseasesAlnusCladosporiumdeciduousin vitromicropropagationseeds

Identifiers

PMID40970489
PMCPMC12447240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.