Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40970298›Full record

ReviewMolecular ecology resources2025

Rapid DNA/eDNA-Based ID Tools for Improved Chondrichthyan Monitoring and Management.

Marcela Maki Alvarenga, Ingrid Vasconcellos Bunholi, Aisni Mayumi C L Adachi, Marcelo Merten Cruz, Leonardo Manir Feitosa, Eduarda Valério de Jesus, Maria Eduarda Leda Lopes, Cintia Povill, Daniela Souza, Yan Torres and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Editorial 2026.Molecular ecology resources · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Marcela Maki AlvarengaCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9549-4810
Ingrid Vasconcellos BunholiDepartment of Marine Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5489-276X
Aisni Mayumi C L AdachiDepartamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus de Botucatu, Botucatu, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2343-6248
Marcelo Merten CruzGrupo de Investigação Biológica Integrada, Centro de Estudos Avançados da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Belém, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8374-5144
Leonardo Manir FeitosaBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1988-5326
Eduarda Valério de JesusDepartamento de Oceanografia Biológica, Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9957-9010
Maria Eduarda Leda LopesDepartamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus de Botucatu, Botucatu, Brazil.
Cintia PovillInstituto Tecnológico Vale-Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Belém, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8494-8939
Daniela SouzaZoological Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2133-9893
Yan TorresPrograma de Pós-graduação em Sistemática, Uso e Conservação da Biodiversidade (PPGSis), Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5520-4092
Antonio Mateo Solé-CavaCENIMP, Centro Nacional para a Identificação Molecular do Pescado, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0363-5821
Rodrigo Rodrigues DominguesDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas e Ambientais, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus do Litoral Paulista, São Vicente, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8979-645X
Patricia CharvetPrograma de Pós-graduação em Sistemática, Uso e Conservação da Biodiversidade (PPGSis), Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8801-433X
Vanessa Paes da CruzDepartamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus de Botucatu, Botucatu, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2450-8701

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFulbright BrazilFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroFundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico PVS-0215-00123.02.00/23Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/05068-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/14631-1Fundação de Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal 2021.05642.BDSave Our Seas Foundation SOSF 588Swiss National Science FoundationThe University of Texas at Austin Marine Science Institute (UTMSI)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid DNA/eDNA-based ID tools, which detect specific genetic patterns without requiring sequencing, are essential for biodiversity and wildlife trade monitoring, particularly for species of conservation concern. However, the practical application of these methods remains limited by the availability of standardised protocols, accessibility of resources, and coverage across diverse taxa. This challenge is especially pronounced for Chondrichthyes, a group heavily overexploited due to fishing and illegal trade, and with data scarcity for conservation assessments. Despite their ecological and economic importance, many species lack reference sequences in databases, as well as other molecular data and tools, hindering the development of molecular tools for species identification and trade regulation. This review synthesises the current state of rapid DNA/eDNA-based ID tools for the detection of chondrichthyan species, including established and emerging methods. It also compiles available taxon-specific primers to facilitate efficient species identification and recommends the most suitable methods. We identify key gaps in taxonomic and geographic coverage, emphasising the need for further research to expand these tools to under-represented species and regions. Additionally, we highlight the importance of integrating genetic approaches into enforcement frameworks to enhance conservation strategies and regulatory compliance. By providing an accessible reference for time- and cost-effective genetic monitoring, this work will support evidence-based decision-making and improve the practical application of rapid DNA/eDNA-based ID tools in the conservation and management of Chondrichthyes species worldwide.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesDNAAnimalsBiodiversityDNAconservation geneticsddPCRelasmobranchenvironmental DNAfisheries managementLAMPMultiplex PCRqPCRsharks and raysspecies identification

Identifiers

PMID40970298
PMCPMC12550492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.