ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Lessons From Federally Qualified Health Centers in the US Territories on Managing Non-Communicable Diseases in the Setting of Disasters: A Qualitative Study Using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study examines disaster preparedness and response in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), which serve vulnerable populations, including individuals with non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Hurricanes Irma and Maria revealed gaps in chronic disease management, contributing to significant mortality. Climate change will likely exacerbate these challenges, necessitating a deeper understanding of preparedness factors.
methodsUsing the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework, we conducted a qualitative study of 2 FQHCs in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, analyzing inner (leadership, organizational culture, and staff dynamics) and outer (funding, networks, and policies) contextual factors. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were analyzed thematically utilizing the EPIS framework.
resultsInterviews with 24 staff members highlighted strong leadership valuing both employees and patients, prior disaster experience, and a culture of continuous improvement as essential for preparedness. Personal support systems improved staff engagement, while external collaborations with relief organizations enhanced response efforts. Flexible policies allowing access to medication and healthcare services beyond insurance coverage were critical for NCD patients during disasters.
conclusionThe EPIS framework successfully contextualized chronic disease management in extreme weather events, identifying strategies to mitigate climate-related health disparities. Strengthening inter-organizational networks and policy adaptability can enhance FQHC resilience, ensuring continued care for at-risk populations during disasters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.