Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40970257›Full record

ArticleBayesian analysis2023

Fast Methods for Posterior Inference of Two-Group Normal-Normal Models.

Philip Greengard, Jeremy Hoskins, Charles C Margossian, Jonah Gabry, Andrew Gelman, Aki Vehtari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bayesian analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philip GreengardColumbia University, New York, USA.
Jeremy HoskinsUniversity of Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Charles C MargossianColumbia University, New York, USA.
Jonah GabryColumbia University, New York, USA.
Andrew GelmanColumbia University, New York, USA.
Aki VehtariAalto University, Finland.

Funding

Software development for Stan to improve survey statistics for non-probability samplesR01AG067149 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GELMAN, ANDREW · 2020 to 2022
$967k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a class of algorithms for evaluating posterior moments of certain Bayesian linear regression models with a normal likelihood and a normal prior on the regression coefficients. The proposed methods can be used for hierarchical mixed effects models with partial pooling over one group of predictors, as well as random effects models with partial pooling over two groups of predictors. We demonstrate the performance of the methods on two applications, one involving U.S. opinion polls and one involving the modeling of COVID-19 outbreaks in Israel using survey data. The algorithms involve analytical marginalization of regression coefficients followed by numerical integration of the remaining low-dimensional density. The dominant cost of the algorithms is an eigendecomposition computed once for each value of the outside parameter of integration. Our approach drastically reduces run times compared to state-of-the-art Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. The latter, in addition to being computationally expensive, can also be difficult to tune when applied to hierarchical models.

Indexed as

fast algorithmshierarchical modelinglinear regressionmixed effects models

Identifiers

PMID40970257
PMCPMC12442500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.