ArticleWestern Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR
Management of an outbreak of invasive group A
Article in Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To outline the management of an outbreak of invasive group A Streptococcus (iGAS) in a residential aged-care facility in rural Queensland, Australia, comparing outbreak management with the newly released Australian Series of National Guidelines (SoNG) for this disease and exploring unique aspects of rural iGAS outbreak management. Methods: An outbreak of iGAS was identified in a rural Queensland residential facility, where two cases occurred within 24 hours. A confirmed case was defined as any individual linked to the facility who had laboratory evidence of group A Streptococcus (GAS) in a sterile site. Whole genome sequencing was performed on all confirmed cases. The public health management of this outbreak was conducted according to the Queensland Communicable Disease Control guidelines and was compared with the new SoNG. Results: A phylogenetic tree confirmed that the two samples clustered closely together with a single allele difference. Chemoprophylaxis was offered to all residents and staff in the affected part of the facility; 95% (42/44) of residents consented to chemoprophylaxis. Increased surveillance for GAS and increased facility cleaning were recommended by the public health unit. No additional cases were identified after 30 days of surveillance. Management of the outbreak largely aligned with the SoNG except for post-outbreak surveillance, which would have been extended under the new guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.