ArticleCureus2025
Ear-Rational Behavior: A Survey Study of Q-tip (Cotton Swab) Habits and Health Perceptions.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionQ-tips (quality-tips) and cotton swabs have long-standing warnings about their use in the external auditory canal. Despite these warnings, cotton swabs are widely used for these purposes. This study aims to investigate the prevalence, motivations, perceptions of safety, and complications associated with the use of cotton swabs in adults who are engaged on social media.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to April 2025 using Google Forms (Google, Mountain View, CA, US), distributed via Instagram (Meta Platforms, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, US). Adults aged 18 years or older were eligible, and surveys that were not completed were excluded. The survey consisted of 17-item questions that explored the use of Q-tips.
resultsOf 257 respondents, 229 completed the survey (85.2%, number (n) = 195 aged 18-29 years; 61.1%, n = 140 held a bachelor's degree). Nearly all participants (95.6%, n = 219) reported using cotton swabs for ear care, primarily to remove cerumen (60.3%, n = 138), with 14.4% (n = 33) reporting daily use. Although 92.6% (n = 212) were aware that medical professionals discourage the use of cotton swabs, 38.4% (n = 88) intended to continue using them, and 38.9% (n = 89) intended to use them occasionally; only 14.4% (n = 33) intended to discontinue their use. Complications were reported by 31.9% (n = 73) of users, most commonly ear discomfort (21.4%, n = 49), cerumen impaction (10.5%, n = 24), and hearing loss (9.2%, n = 21). A small proportion of these individuals sought medical care (8.8%, n = 6). The mean perceived safety score among participants was 3.0 (neutral) on a five-point scale.
conclusionThe use of Q-tips remains nearly universal in this young, highly educated, and socially media-engaged population, despite widespread awareness of professional warnings. Nearly one-third of users reported complications, yet most planned to continue using the product. These findings underscore a persistent gap between knowledge and behavior, highlighting the need for targeted public health campaigns that not only discourage cotton swab use but also promote safe, practical alternatives for ear care. Social media may be a valuable platform for such interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.