ReviewDiscover agriculture2025
A systematic review of food-environment interactions in catchment models.
Review in Discover agriculture, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper provides a systematic review of food-environment interactions in catchment models, focusing on the complex relationships between land use, ecosystem services, and agricultural production. The review highlights the importance of catchment-scale models in understanding the impact of land use on local ecosystems, particularly in relation to water quality, biodiversity, and soil services. By examining various international catchment-scale models, with an emphasis on the micro and macro disparities, the paper identifies key methodological lessons and future opportunities to enhance these frameworks for more effective policy design and environmental management. The review is structured around a conceptual framework that categorises models into environmental models, which focus on ecosystem dynamics, and physical models, which examine structural and material aspects of land use systems, as well as human dimensions, with a specific focus on reducing net emissions and improving land productivity. This relationship is described through a conceptual framework. The paper also emphasises the significance of spatial and temporal factors in these models, noting gaps in the literature limited integration of food production into catchment models, underrepresentation of localised/catchment-level modelling, data limitations, particularly lack of georeferenced micro-level data, inadequate incorporation of climate change scenarios and temporal variability, weak integration of biophysical, economic, and social factors, insufficient analysis of policy and governance impacts at catchment scale and lack of farm-specific, actionable recommendations. The research highlights the critical need for enhanced data accessibility, environmental model maintainability, standardised land use variable definitions, and improved georeferencing in land use modelling. The findings emphasise the importance of long-term projections, integration of social, economic, and biophysical factors, and open data initiatives to bolster essential research infrastructure and foster stakeholder engagement for more effective agricultural policy and environmental management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.