ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Clinical Model for Predicting Rupture in Ectopic Pregnancy: A Web-Based Nomogram Approach.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Predictive Value of Systemic Inflammatory Markers from Failed Single-Dose Methotrexate Therapy in Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model for rupture-associated bleeding in ectopic pregnancy (EP) and to construct a web-based nomogram to support early clinical intervention in women at elevated risk. Methods: Clinical data were retrospectively collected from 543 women with EP at Hexian Memorial Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, between June 2019 and June 2022. Among these, 58 cases were confirmed intraoperatively to have experienced rupture with bleeding. The cohort was randomly divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) subsets. Key predictive variables were selected using the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, guided by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curve (CIC). A web-based nomogram was subsequently developed for clinical implementation. Results: Seven predictive variables were identified and used to construct the model. The ROC curve yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.941 (95% CI: 0.882-0.968) in the training subset and 0.970 (95% CI: 0.9405-0.990) in the validation subset. Calibration curves demonstrated strong concordance between predicted probabilities and observed outcomes. DCA indicated a clinically meaningful predictive probability range between 1% and 94.82%. A dynamic, web-based nomogram was created to facilitate practical application. Conclusion: A clinically applicable predictive model for rupture in EP was developed and validated, incorporating seven key variables. The web-based nomogram enables early risk stratification and intervention, potentially reducing the incidence of rupture-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.