Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40970142›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Beyond the numbers: the importance of contextual data when reusing blood pressure data from electronic health records.

Marieke E Grünewald, Erik Koomen, Lex M van Loon, Ankit Gupta, Robin W M Vernooij, Wouter W van Solinge, Teus Kappen, Saskia Haitjema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marieke E GrünewaldCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Erik KoomenPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Wilhelmina's Children's hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Lex M van LoonIntensive Care Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Ankit GuptaSiemens Healthcare Private Limited, Bangalore, India.
Robin W M VernooijCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Wouter W van SolingeCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Teus KappenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Saskia HaitjemaCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the digitization of health records, the reuse of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data has become increasingly prevalent in research. Using blood pressure as a case study, this paper examines the complexities and practical realities of reusing EHR data, emphasizing the importance of contextual information for accurate interpretation. Although blood pressure data derived from EHR systems may appear straightforward-often captured by machines or derived from standardized workflows-their reuse is frequently complicated by variability in measurement methods and clinical contexts, which can produce seemingly similar but clinically distinct blood pressure readings. The paper begins with the physiology of blood pressure and the various techniques used to measure it. This is followed by an analysis of different clinical settings-i.e., the different pathophysiological situations-that may affect both measurement practices and data interpretation. The paper then explores how these measurements are recorded in EHR systems and concludes with practical guidance to support researchers in identifying blood pressure data that are truly fit for the intended research purpose. By acknowledging the inherent complexities of healthcare data and making informed data selection decisions, researchers can better harness the potential of EHRs to generate meaningful insights that ultimately improve patient care.

Indexed as

blood pressurecontextual datadata reuseEHDSelectronic health recordsfit for purposesemantic interoperability

Identifiers

PMID40970142
PMCPMC12440906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.