ArticleHealth science reports2025
Benchmarking Public Sector Food Environment Policies in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Expert Assessment Study to Address Implementation Gaps.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The escalating burden of obesity and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Iran presents a critical public health challenge, underscoring the need for evidence-based policies that foster healthier food environments. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate national-level food environment policies and supporting infrastructure in Iran using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI), benchmarked against international best practices, and to identify priority policy actions to address key implementation gaps. Methods: The Food-EPI tool was adapted and validated for the Iranian context through expert consultation, including content and face validity assessments. A systematic review of 89 government policy documents was conducted. Thirty-nine experts from academia, government, and civil society assessed the extent of implementation of 47 Food-EPI indicators across 13 domains, using a 5-point scale relative to international benchmarks. Qualitative content analysis of expert feedback was used to extract and synthesize proposed actions to strengthen the current policy landscape. Results: No policy indicators achieved a "high" implementation rating. The majority of indicators were rated as "low" or "moderate" level of implementation, with the highest scores observed for food composition targets, front-of-pack labeling, and nutrient declarations. Key weaknesses were identified in food promotion, retail regulation, food trade, governance, and transparency. Infrastructure support performed better than policy implementation, particularly in areas such as obesity and NCD monitoring. Experts proposed 48 priority actions emphasizing strengthened regulatory enforcement, enhanced monitoring and intelligence systems, improved intersectoral coordination, sustainable funding mechanisms, and increased public awareness to create a healthier food environment. Conclusion: This first Food-EPI assessment in Iran reveals substantial opportunities to improve both policy content and implementation to support healthier food environments. The results offer a strategic roadmap for Iranian policymakers to strengthen nutrition governance and reduce diet-related health inequities. Aligning national efforts with global best practices can accelerate progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals and improved population health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.