ArticleHealth science reports2025
Are Physicians' USMLE Scores Associated With Patient Mortality? A Multilevel Modeling Approach to USMLE Predictive Validity Evidence.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Are Physicians' USMLE Scores Associated With Patient Mortality? A Multilevel Modeling Approach to USMLE Predictive Validity Evidence.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Validity evidence for high-stakes licensing examinations, particularly the association between exam scores and clinical practice outcomes, is essential for supporting valid score-based inferences. However, a gap existed in understanding how variability in patient in-hospital mortality is partitioned between physicians and hospitals and how physicians' USMLE composite scores are associated with patient mortality using multilevel modeling. Thus, we examined variability in patient in-hospital mortality between physicians and hospitals and investigated the association between physicians USMLE composite scores and patient mortality, controlling for patient, physician, and hospital characteristics. Methods: Hospitalization data were sourced from the American Medical Association, USMLE program, and Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council. Deidentified data included 150,907 patients nested within 1744 physicians in 170 hospitals. Multilevel logistic regression, including a random intercept and six conditional hierarchical models, was used to account for the nested structure and control for covariates. The seven fitted models were compared descriptively and inferentially. Results: Approximately 5% and 12% of the variability in patient mortality was attributable to physicians and hospitals, respectively. A one standard deviation increase in the USMLE composite score significantly predicted a 6% reduction in patient mortality (odds ratio 0.94; 95% CI = 0.89, 0.99), controlling for patient, physician, and hospital covariates. Conclusion: Results highlight variability in mortality attributable to physicians and hospitals and underscore the predictive value of USMLE scores. Higher USMLE composite scores were associated with a lower likelihood of patient in-hospital mortality, providing additional validity evidence for the exam and supporting its use for licensure decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.