Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40970070›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Social Media Use During Pregnancy: Risks and Benefits for Women's Health.

Nida Aftab

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nida AftabObstetrics and Gynaecology, Hywel Dda University Health Board, NHS Wales, Camarthen, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media use during pregnancy is increasingly common, with millions of women sharing and seeking information on platforms like Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat, Pinterest, Twitter (X), and many others. These online forums can provide valuable benefits by offering social support, health education, and peer-to-peer advice. However, social media also carries risks: exposure to misinformation, unrealistic ideals, and negative social comparisons can increase anxiety, body dissatisfaction, and health confusion. This review examines evidence from recent peer-reviewed studies (2019-2025) on the risks and benefits of social media use for pregnant women's health. Using a comprehensive literature search, we identified relevant studies from the US, UK, Europe, and Asia. Key findings are that most pregnant women use social media for quick pregnancy information and emotional support, but the quality of information is uneven. Professional moderation and evidence-based content can enhance benefits, while unmoderated or highly visual content often leads to stress or misleading beliefs. Social media has the potential to positively supplement prenatal care if used carefully and with guidance, but women and healthcare providers should be aware of its pitfalls. Further research is needed on effective interventions to maximize benefits and minimize harms.

Indexed as

among pregnant womenbaby carebody dissatisfactionmother-baby relationshippregnancyprenatal care awarenesspublic health problemsrisks and benefitssocial media communicationwomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID40970070
PMCPMC12443360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.