Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40970024›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

C-reactive Protein Versus Procalcitonin in the Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review.

Sri Vidya Sundara, Xinyu Lu, Hamide Busmail, Sasika Weerakoon, Sravanthi Avula, Bethel T Mandefro, Lubna Mohammed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sri Vidya SundaraPediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Xinyu LuOtolaryngology, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Shanghai, CHN.
Hamide BusmailInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sasika WeerakoonInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sravanthi AvulaPediatrics, NRI (Non-resident Indian) Medical College, Guntur, IND.
Bethel T MandefroInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Lubna MohammedInternal Medicine, Dr Vizarath Rasool Khan (VRK) Women's Medical College, Hyderabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal sepsis is a systemic response to a bacterial infection within the first 28 days of life. Diagnosis remains a challenge due to the subtle and nonspecific signs, often resulting in the use of empirical antibiotics and their associated risks. This systematic review aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. The review was conducted using our search strategy across PubMed/Medline, PubMed Central, Europe PMC, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included free full-text systematic reviews, narrative reviews, diagnostic accuracy studies, and observational studies published in English between 2020 and 2025. Studies published in foreign languages, based on non-human studies, as well as grey literature that lacked free full-text articles, were excluded from the analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using appropriate quality assessment tools. Of the 16 initially eligible studies, 12 met the inclusion criteria after quality assessment; these consisted of eight narrative reviews, three diagnostic accuracy studies, and one observational study. Our systematic review found that although CRP is widely utilized due to its low cost and simplicity, its limited early sensitivity and susceptibility to non-infectious factors reduce its utility in diagnosing neonatal sepsis. In contrast, PCT demonstrated an earlier rise, correlates with the severity of the disease, has higher sensitivity (reported as 97.6 and 97.7% in two studies), and can differentiate between bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. However, PCT displays a physiological rise, can be influenced by non-infectious factors, and is costlier. In both cases, serial measurements and the use of adjusted nomograms enhance their use. In conclusion, PCT demonstrates superior diagnostic potential and utility in guiding antibiotic therapy compared to CRP for early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, especially when used in combination with other biomarkers. As part of our review, we noted the absence of procalcitonin in current international neonatal sepsis guidelines, and we have proposed a flowchart to guide its potential integration into clinical practice. Future research should focus on large, low-bias studies, the identification of standardized cut-off values, the development of adjusted nomograms, and the validation of emerging diagnostic technologies. This systematic review is not registered, as PROSPERO currently does not support registration of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Indexed as

antibiotic stewardship in nicuantibiotic use in newbornc-reactive protein (crp)early onset neonatal sepsis (eons)late onset neonatal sepsis (lons)neonatal sepsisprocalcitonin (pct)sepsis biomarkerssepsis biomarker sensitivitysepsis biomarker specificity

Identifiers

PMID40970024
PMCPMC12441651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.