ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Rapid and reliable alpha angle measurement using a smartphone-based artificial intelligence system for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid and reliable alpha angle measurement using a smartphone-based artificial intelligence system for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Manual alpha angle measurement for diagnosing cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is time-consuming and variable. We hypothesised that a smartphone-based artificial intelligence (AI) system would demonstrate a high correlation with the conventional manual method. Methods: We trained an AI model using 300 of the 45° Dunn view radiographs in a Python-based environment. The model was implemented using a smartphone application that semi-automatically extracted the femoral head from radiographs, detected at least four rim points, and calculated the femoral head centre and radius using a least-squares method. It also identified the narrowest part of the femoral neck, and allowed manual adjustment of the alpha angle deviation. The images were directly captured and transferred without time loss. We evaluated 130 hips of patients with hip pain who underwent 45° Dunn view radiography. The alpha angle was measured using both the AI system and the manual method. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess agreement between the two methods. Measurement time and intra- and interobserver reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: Pearson correlation coefficient for alpha angle measurement between the two methods was 0.91, indicating a strong correlation. The average alpha angle measured by the AI system (52.7 ± 6.0°) was not significantly different from that of the conventional method (53.9 ± 6.5°, Conclusion: The AI-powered system showed a strong correlation with the manual method and significantly reduced measurement time. This smartphone-based tool offers a rapid and reliable approach for real-time assessment of alpha angles and may help standardise the evaluation of cam-type FAI in clinical practice. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.