ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Effectiveness of pharmacological procedural sedation in children with cerebral palsy undergoing botulinum toxin injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Botulinum Toxin in Children and Adolescents-A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Applications.Toxins · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Botulinum toxin injection (BTI) is a well-established therapeutic option for focal spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (CP). However, the procedure is associated with significant anxiety, pain, and discomfort, highlighting the importance of using sedation and distraction techniques. To date, no specific guideline exists for procedural sedation during BTI in children with CP. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the strategies for improving the experience of children with CP during BTI. Articles published up to July 2024 were identified through PubMed searches, and after screening, ten studies involving children aged 0-18 with CP were selected. Pain levels during BTI procedure was assessed using specific pain scales. Nitrous oxide was used as a sedation treatment in 7 studies, either alone (3 studies), combined with topical anaesthetic (3 studies), or alongside both topical anaesthetics and distraction techniques (2 studies). Its use reduced distress, with the greatest effect when combined with topical anaesthetic. These results suggest that the combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods may be a reasonable approach. The most common limitations of the studies included were the absence of a clear definition of the degree of cognitive impairment, the lack of dedicated pain assessment scales, insufficient consideration of caregiver involvement, and of non-pharmacological techniques. Further research is needed to establish standardized guidelines for procedural sedation during BTI in children with CP, focusing on randomized controlled study designs, precise population definitions, the effectiveness of distraction techniques, caregiver involvement, and the use of dedicated pain assessment scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.