ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Full-head segmentation of MRI with abnormal brain anatomy: model and data release.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-driven integration of imaging and radiology language improves stroke mortality prediction.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Our goal was to develop a deep network for whole-head segmentation, including clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with abnormal anatomy, and compile the first public benchmark dataset for this purpose. We collected 98 MRIs with volumetric segmentation labels for a diverse set of human subjects, including normal and abnormal anatomy in clinical cases of stroke and disorders of consciousness. Approach: Training labels were generated by manually correcting initial automated segmentations for skin/scalp, skull, cerebro-spinal fluid, gray matter, white matter, air cavity, and extracephalic air. We developed a "MultiAxial" network consisting of three 2D U-Net that operate independently in sagittal, axial, and coronal planes, which are then combined to produce a single 3D segmentation. Results: The MultiAxial network achieved a test-set Dice scores of Conclusions: We are releasing a new state-of-the-art tool for whole-head MRI segmentation in abnormal anatomy, along with the largest volume of labeled clinical head MRIs, including labels for nonbrain structures. Together, the model and data may serve as a benchmark for future efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.