ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2025
Nanomotion-Based Drug Sensitivity Prediction in Ovarian and Colon Cancer Cell Lines Using Machine Learning.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid delineation ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Nanomotion-enabled ultra-rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing with magnetic bead-based pathogen enrichment for accelerated sepsis diagnostics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer drug resistance remains a critical challenge in oncology, demanding rapid and reliable diagnostic tools to assess tumor cell susceptibility to treatment. This study presents a nanomotion-based drug susceptibility testing (DST) approach, integrating nanoscale movement analysis with supervised machine learning to classify drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cancer cells. Using label-free, real-time nanomotion technology, we measured the dynamic responses of colon cancer (SW480) and ovarian cancer (A2780, A2780ADR) cells to doxorubicin under physiological conditions. Features extracted from nanomotion signals were used to train machine learning models, achieving 90.9% accuracy in distinguishing between doxorubicin-treated and untreated SW480 cells and 84.6% accuracy in classifying doxorubicin-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer cells. The model achieved perfect classification of resistant A2780ADR cells in an independent test set after only 4 h and 15 min of exposure to the drug. Unlike genetic tests that infer drug resistance from molecular markers or metabolic assays requiring extended incubation times, nanomotion-based DST provides a direct phenotypic readout, offering a faster, label-free alternative for assessing tumor cell responses. While further dataset expansion and model refinement are necessary to enhance generalizability, these results underscore the potential of nanomotion technology as a rapid, phenotypic DST for personalized oncology. By directly measuring the mechanical behavior of cancer cells in response to chemotherapy, this method could transform clinical decision-making, enabling faster, more precise treatment strategies to combat drug resistance in cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.