Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969859›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

COVID-19 and sexual assault: trends in US emergency department visits-a cross-sectional analysis.

Rose McKeon Olson, Bharti Khurana, Randall T Loder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rose McKeon OlsonDivision of Global Health Equity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6448-9517
Bharti KhuranaDivision of Women's Health, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Randall T LoderOrthopaedic Surgery, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sexual assault often increases during crises, yet trends in United States (US) emergency department (ED) visits for sexual assault during COVID-19 remain unclear. Objective: To examine demographic, incident and injury trends in US sexual assault presentations during early and late COVID-19 compared with pre-COVID-19. Methods: This study analysed National Electronic Injury Surveillance System All Injury Programme (2014-2021) retrospective data. ED visits for assault (n=246 499) and sexual assault (n=22 752) were compared across pre-COVID-19 (January 2014-March 2020), early COVID-19 (March 2020-January 2021) and late COVID-19 (February 2021-December 2021). Demographic and injury trends were analysed via t-tests, analysis of variance or χ² tests, with national trends assessed using Joinpoint regression and weighted data in SUDAAN. Results: From 2017 to 2021, while assault-related ED visits declined (-5.05% annually; p=0.003), sexual assault ED visits remained stable (-1.15% annually; p=0.57). During COVID-19, sexual assault cases decreased among 0-19 years (46.1% pre-COVID-19 to 37.3% late COVID-19) but increased among 20-34 years (36.0% to 40.3%) and 35-64 years (17.2% to 21.0%). From early to late COVID-19, cases increased among black (31.7% to 32.8%) and Hispanic (13.8% to 15.6%) populations but declined among white populations (49.5% to 47.7%). Assaults by parents (9.0% to 11.2%) and partners (10.9% to 13.5%) increased, as did poisoning-related (1.4% to 5.5%) and anoxia-related injuries (0.1% to 0.7%). Conclusions: Despite the pandemic, ED visits for sexual assault persisted, with demographic shifts and increased injury severity (eg, drug-facilitated violence, strangulation-related anoxia). These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions during public health crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19EmergenciesSexual HealthViolence

Identifiers

PMID40969859
PMCPMC12443212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.