ArticleHospital pharmacy2026
Impact of Clinical Pharmacists' Interventions on Medication Use and Direct Cost Savings in an Inpatient Medical Oncology Setting.
Article in Hospital pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There are limited studies evaluating the impact of clinical pharmacists' interventions (CPIs) and pharmacist-driven cost savings in the inpatient oncology settings. This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of CPIs and direct cost savings from deprescribing-related interventions in an inpatient oncology service. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted by assessing CPIs extracted from the pharmacy documentation system in the medical oncology service between January 2022 and December 2023. The clinical impact of these CPIs was evaluated through including interventions accepted by physicians and resulted in therapy changes, along with their significance levels. Direct cost savings were calculated for deprescribing interventions, including drug discontinuation and intravenous-to-oral (IV-PO) conversions, based on the cost saved per intervention over a 24-hour period. Results: During the study period, 9995 CPIs were identified, of which, 99.0% (n = 9887) were accepted by physicians and included in the analysis. The most frequent interventions were recommendations for drug additions/dose change (n = 3603, 36.4%), followed by drug discontinuations (n = 2886, 29.0%). Antimicrobials were the most frequently involved drug class (n = 4017, 40.7%). Significant CPIs that improved standard of care accounted for 7274 (73.6%) interventions, while very significant and extremely significant interventions were 2595 (26.3%) and 14 (0.14%), respectively. The overall direct cost savings from deprescribing were $102 710, with drug therapy discontinuations and IV-PO conversions contributing $99 305 and $3405, respectively. Conclusion: CPIs showed significant clinical and financial impact, with a high rate of accepted interventions resulting in therapy changes. Further prospective studies are required to analyze the clinical outcomes and indirect cost savings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.