Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969852›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2025

A standardised workflow to manage the complexity of reirradiation and radiotherapy retreatments in clinical practice.

Madalyne Day, Jonas Willmann, Panagiotis Balermpas, Riccardo Dal Bello, Anja Joye, Laura Motisi, Jens von der Grün, Crystal Sulaiman, Lotte Wilke, Nazanin Rahnama and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Madalyne DayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonas WillmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Panagiotis BalermpasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Riccardo Dal BelloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Anja JoyeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Laura MotisiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jens von der GrünDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Crystal SulaimanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lotte WilkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nazanin RahnamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stephanie Tanadini-LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As cancer patients survive longer, the number of radiotherapy retreatments is steadily increasing [1], requiring laborious review of previous treatments, decisions regarding image registration, dose accumulation and assessment of such composite dose distributions. This work presents the development, and implementation of a standardised dedicated workflow for reirradiation (reRT) and radiotherapy retreatment based on the EORTC/ESTRO consensus on reRT.

Indexed as

ReirradiationRetreatmentWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID40969852
PMCPMC12441716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.