ReviewSAGE open nursing
Two Decades of Research in Gastric Cancer Care: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis.
Review in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to elucidate the current research focus, emerging hotspots, and trends in the field of gastric cancer nursing through bibliometric and visual analyses. Methods: Data were sourced from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), and CiteSpace was used to conduct a comprehensive visual analysis of publication frequency, geographic distribution, institutional participation, key terms, trends, and areas of interest. Results: A comprehensive analysis was conducted on 241 articles published between 2003 and 2024, representing contributions from 439 authors across 39 countries and regions. Among the top five authors by publication volume, Sung Kim from South Korea was the most prolific, having authored three articles. The most frequently occurring keywords were "gastric cancer" and "quality of life." Keyword clustering revealed "postoperative recovery" and "self-reported experience" as the most prominent clusters. Notably, research on "symptoms" began emerging in 2022 and remains active, representing a newly developing area that is anticipated to become a key research focus in gastric cancer management. Conclusions: This study presents a bibliometric overview of gastric cancer nursing research from 2003 to 2024, highlighting contributions by countries, institutions, authors, and journals. It also identifies dominant research themes and emerging trends. In particular, the investigation of risk factors and symptom cluster analysis have gained traction, providing valuable directions for future research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.