ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Structured Development of Learning and Assessment Tasks to Prevent Generative AI Misuse and Enhance AI Literacy in the Faculty in Physiotherapy Education.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in higher education necessitates redesign of learning activities and assessments to uphold academic integrity and foster AI literacy. This article presents a structured approach to developing educational strategies that mitigate GAI misuse while enhancing students' understanding of GAI, with a focus on collaborative faculty engagement and curricular adaptation in physiotherapy education. Methods: Using the Quality Implementation Framework (QIF), we conducted a comprehensive review of all courses within a Swedish physiotherapy program employing a problem-based learning (PBL) model. Faculty-wide, time-bound development initiatives were implemented, including targeted AI literacy training. A student survey was conducted to assess GAI usage patterns and perceptions. Results: Assessment formats were adapted to emphasize clinical reasoning and critical thinking, reducing opportunities for GAI misuse. Standardized guidelines on acceptable GAI use were integrated across all courses. The survey results 2 months after implementation indicated diverse usage patterns: 13% of students reported daily use of GAI, while 24% had never used it. Additionally, 42% felt adequately informed about GAI. Faculty AI literacy and confidence improved through structured group work and feedback, supporting the integration of AI-related tasks into the curriculum. Conclusions: The systematic approach using QIF and PBL, expert support, faculty champions, problem-solving strategies, and feedback, enabled meaningful curricular changes within 4 months. The variability in student GAI use underscores the need for equitable AI literacy education. This approach not only reduced the risk of GAI misuse but also enhanced faculty preparedness, offering a scalable model for other health sciences programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.