ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Preferences of patients with depression for medication management: a discrete choice experiment.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression threatens people's health and imposes heavy economic burden on society. Oral antidepressants are the first-line treatment for depression. However, poor adherence in depressed patients contributes to poor clinical outcomes. Effective medication management can improve patient adherence, but the current approaches to medication management in depression have shown limited success. Understanding patients' needs and preferences can help improve their medication adherence. There are no data on the preferences of depressed patients in developing countries. Objective: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to elicit and quantify the preferences of people with depression for medication management, and to provide references for the development of effective medication management strategies to improve the medication adherence of people with depression. Methods: The design principles of discrete choice experiments were used to develop the survey instrument. Attributes included adverse reactions, provider, follow-up frequency, cost, follow-up method, and convenience of purchase. A mixed logit model was used to estimate the preferences, willingness to pay (WTP), subgroup analyses based on relapse, and the uptake rates of different medication management program using the NLCOM command. Results: The preferences of 373 people with depression were analyzed. The six attributes included in this study had a significant impact on preferences of people with depression (P < 0.05). Slight adverse reactions were the most important attribute level (coefficient =0.905), with the highest willingness to pay, and increased program uptake by 0.362. Patients who did not experience recurrence preferred to go to the pharmacy to purchase antidepressants on site. In terms of follow-up methods, those with recurrence experience preferred remote follow-up. Providing face-to-face and telephone/we-chat follow-up by psychiatrists, and with slight adverse reactions, the probability of receiving medication management program increased by 0.478, which was close to the optimal medication management program. Conclusion: The formulation of medication management strategies should be rooted in the preferences of people with depression. The impact of recurrent depression experiences on preferences should be considered when forming collaborative care teams consisting of psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, and family physicians to address the complex and multifaceted needs of people with depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.