Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969684›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Mapping play-based interventions for children with disabilities in LMICs: a scoping review on cultural relevance, implementation, and impact.

Veronika Reichenberger, Alberta S J van der Watt, Quinette Louw, Soraya Seedat, Tracey Smythe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Veronika ReichenbergerInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, PHP, LSHTM, UK.
Alberta S J van der WattDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Quinette LouwDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Soraya SeedatSAMRC Genomics and Brain Disorders Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Tracey SmytheInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, PHP, LSHTM, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Over 90% of children with disabilities live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and experience worse health outcomes than their peers. Play-based interventions may improve the well-being and quality of life of children with disabilities and their caregivers. We aimed to identify and map the evidence on play-based interventions for children with disabilities in LMICs. Methods: Following a systematic search of Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, African Journals Online, and LILACS, we screened 2577 studies for inclusion in October 2024. We used thematic analysis to summarise the data. Findings: Twenty eligible studies were identified that targeted children with disabilities, aged 2-12 years. Most studies (55%) focused on how play supports therapy, communication, and skills development, while fewer studies (15%) explored feasibility, developmental outcomes, or parental support. A substantial proportion of studies took place in upper-middle-income countries (60%) and 50% were from Central and South America. Many interventions were delivered by researchers (55%), with some involving parents (25%), community members (5%), or health professionals (10%). Cultural and contextual adaptations were noted in 40% of studies, and these changes were typically confined to surface features such as use of local languages, traditional games, and culturally relevant illustrations. While most studies reported positive outcomes, concerns were raised about limited parental engagement and challenges in adaptation. Only one study conducted a cost analysis. Ten grey literature resources met inclusion criteria. These resources offered practical guidance, mainly for caregivers and educators, on making play accessible for children with disabilities. Most emphasised play's role in development and inclusion, with 80% providing specific strategies, though none addressed cultural adaptation. Interpretation: Play-based interventions have the potential to enhance therapy, communication, and social inclusion, although gaps remain in understanding their feasibility and scalability. The lack of economic evaluations also limits the understanding of how these interventions can be implemented in low-resource settings. Our review highlights critical gaps in play-based interventions for children with disabilities in LMICs. Despite growing interest since the UNCRPD, play remains under-researched, with most studies being small-scale, short-term, and lacking cost analysis. Interventions rarely involved communities or addressed cultural relevance in depth. Future research should prioritise inclusive, community-driven, and culturally adapted approaches. Clearer documentation, economic evaluations, and rigorous methods are needed to ensure effective, scalable, and meaningful support. Promoting culturally grounded play can improve social inclusion, development, and dignity for children with disabilities. Funding: The scoping review was supported by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (UKRI165) awarded to Prof Tracey Smythe in collaboration with the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

Indexed as

CaregiversChildrenDevelopmental disabilityInterventionScoping reviewSocial inclusion

Identifiers

PMID40969684
PMCPMC12441714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.