Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969683›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

The descriptive epidemiology of age at colorectal cancer diagnosis in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nicholas Matovu, Helen G Coleman, Ines Mesa-Eguiagaray, Evropi Theodoratou, Charlene M McShane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas MatovuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kyambogo University, Kampala, Uganda.
Helen G ColemanCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Ines Mesa-EguiagarayCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Evropi TheodoratouCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Charlene M McShaneCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimal age for introducing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains controversial especially in low-and middle-income countries, where evidence is limited, and the CRC incidence appears to be gradually increasing. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarise the age profile of CRC cases at diagnosis on the African continent to inform the most appropriate age for CRC screening initiation. Methods: Four electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched using relevant subject headings and keywords from 1 January 2012 to 22 September 2023. The third volume of the African Cancer Registry Network (AFCRN) report was also included. Studies of African populations reporting the age profiles of representative CRC patient populations were eligible for inclusion. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool mean age at CRC diagnosis, and the proportions of early-onset CRC (EOCRC); <40 and <50 years old. Age-specific incidence rates and proportions of EOCRC were calculated from the AFCRN report. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020187538. Findings: Eighty-seven (87) studies reporting on 72,204 CRC cases from 24 African countries were included. The pooled mean age at CRC diagnosis was 53.5 years, with significant regional variations observed. The pooled proportion of EOCRC cases diagnosed <40 years old was 21% (95% confidence interval (CI): 18%-25%; n = 44 studies) and 38% for those <50 years old (95% CI 35%-41%; n = 41 studies). Estimated proportions of EOCRC from published studies and the AFCRN report were comparable. Interpretation: Whereas the incidence of CRC is still low in Africa, there is younger age at diagnosis and an overall high proportion of EOCRC. Future CRC screening programs on the continent may need to consider a lower CRC screening age compared to that used in Western countries where EOCRC appears to be less common. Funding: This work was funded by the Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences (FMHLS), Queen's University Belfast and the Department for the Economy, Northern Ireland in support of the doctoral degree of N.M.

Indexed as

AfricaAgeColorectal neoplasmsEarly-onset colorectal cancerEpidemiologyGlobal health

Identifiers

PMID40969683
PMCPMC12441720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.