ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Comparative effectiveness of oral nutritional supplements in preventing respiratory tract infections among adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of different probiotic strains and preparations for prevention of acute otitis media in children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Gut Microbiota and Probiotics in Influenza: A Narrative Review of Mechanisms and Emerging Evidence.Viruses · 2026Review
- Integration Analysis of Bayesian and Machine Learning for Heterogeneity, Biomarkers, and Optimal Combination Regimens of Pucotenlimab in Solid Tumors.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Different nutritional supplements may prevent respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in adults, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of oral nutritional supplements in preventing RTIs and reducing their symptom duration and severity. Methods: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing oral micronutrients, flavonoids, probiotics, or synbiotics in adults for the prevention of RTIs in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to February 25, 2025. Studies with participants under 18 years, immunodeficiencies, non-oral administration, or a therapeutic rather than preventive focus were excluded. We performed network meta-analyses (NMA) using frequentist random-effects models to compare interventions through direct and indirect evidence. We used the CINeMA framework to rate the overall certainty of evidence. The primary outcome was the incidence of RTIs. The secondary outcomes were upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) or common cold, COVID-19 or influenza, RTI symptom duration, RTI symptom severity, and adverse events. The study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD420250653276. Findings: We identified 120 eligible trials, among which 107 trials involving 101,751 adults were included in the network meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, catechin (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.95; n = 5; high certainty), Interpretation: Based on the current evidence, catechin, Funding: This work was supported by the Ningbo Top Medical and Health Research Program and the Zhejiang Provincial Disease Prevention and Control Science and Technology Plan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.