ArticlePEC innovation2025
Online training for Japanese healthcare professionals in the development and use of patient decision aids to facilitate shared decision-making: An acceptability study.
Article in PEC innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To 1) design an online training program for Japanese healthcare professionals (HCPs) on the development and use of patient decision aids (PtDAs); 2) assess the acceptability of the program, participants' satisfaction with it, and their intention to develop and implement PtDAs, and 3) obtain suggestions from participants to improve the program. Methods: A user-centered approach was used to design an online training program for Japanese HCPs on the development and use of PtDAs. HCPs (physicians, nurses, midwives, psychologists, etc.) were recruited to evaluate the training. A total of 40 HCPs completed questionnaires regarding the acceptability of the program, their satisfaction with it, intentions to develop and use PtDAs, and suggestions for improving the program. Results: Acceptability ratings for the program were high, with over 90 % of participants finding it useful and easy to understand. Thirty-nine of the 40 participants watched all the videos at least once. Ninety percent of the sample were satisfied with the program, and 95 % ( Conclusion: Our online training program for Japanese HCPs on the development and use of PtDAs was acceptable and useful, and most professionals indicated their intentions to use such tools. Innovation: There is a lack of resources on PtDAs in Japan. Our online training program is an innovative resource for HCPs that fills an important gap in facilitating shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.