ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Decoding the association between health level and human settlements environment: a machine learning-driven provincial analysis in China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rapid urbanization in China has significantly reshaped the human settlement environment (HSE), bringing opportunities and challenges for public health. While existing studies have explored environmental-health relationships, most are confined to micro-level contexts, focus on single environmental dimensions, or assess specific diseases, thus lacking a comprehensive, macro-level understanding. Objective: This study aims to assess the associations between population health level and multidimensional HSE features at the provincial level in China and uncover nonlinear relationships and interaction effects underlying the association between HSE and population health level. Methods: Using panel data from 31 Chinese provinces spanning 2012 to 2022, a composite Health Level Index (HLI) was constructed based on four core health indicators using the Entropy-TOPSIS method. 19 HSE indicators covering five dimensions-ecological environment, living environment, infrastructure, public services, and sustainable environment-were selected as explanatory variables. The study employed the XGBoost machine learning algorithm to model the relationship between HSE and HLI. SHAP values and Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs) were used to interpret feature importance, nonlinear relationships, threshold values, and interaction effects. Results: XGBoost outperformed all benchmark models, confirming its strong predictive capacity. SHAP analysis identified six key features-number of medical institution beds (NMIB), urbanization rate (UR), mobile phone penetration rate (MPPR), road area per capita (RAPC), population density (PD), and urban gas penetration rate (UGPR)-as the most influential factors. Nonlinear relationships and threshold effects were observed between key features and population health level. PDP plots further revealed that optimal health levels are typically associated with high UR, high MPPR, high RAPC, and moderate NMIB, underscoring the importance of structural synergy over isolated infrastructure expansion. Conclusion: This study provides robust evidence that the relationship between HSE and health is nonlinear, multidimensional, and highly interactive. Effective urban health governance requires coordinated development of urbanization, digital infrastructure, and public services, along with rational healthcare resource allocation. The findings offer actionable insights for health-oriented urban planning and policy formulation in rapidly urbanizing regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.