ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Real-world data-driven early warning system for risk-stratified liver injury in hospitalized COVID-19 patients-Machine learning models for clinical decision support.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data-Driven Medicine and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Real-World Evidence, Opportunities, and Safeguards.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a real-world evidence-driven early warning system for the risk-stratified prediction of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated hepatic dysfunction in hospitalized patients, leveraging interpretable machine learning models to provide clinically actionable decision support for timely intervention. Methods: A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted utilizing high-resolution electronic health records (EHRs) from 983 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Clinical features (e.g., laboratory results, medication exposures, and disease progression markers) were systematically analyzed. To mitigate class imbalance, we employed the Synthetic Minority Oversampling TEchnique (SMOTE) prior to model development. Thirteen distinct machine learning (ML) algorithms were trained and benchmarked to construct an optimal risk stratification framework. Model performance was rigorously evaluated using metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was employed to enhance clinical interpretability and provide transparent insights for decision-making. Results: The SMOTE-edited nearest neighbors (ENN) technique (SMOTE-ENN) resampling strategy, combined with random forest (RF) and extra trees (ET) models, demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving AUC values of 0.998 ± 0.002 (RF) and 0.997 ± 0.002 (ET), respectively. The SHAP-based interpretability analysis identified glutathione administration and hepatic enzymes (e.g., gamma-glutamyltransferase [GGT] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT]) as the most influential predictors. The online prediction platforms were developed for liver injury early warning risk stratification (low- and high-risk) based on predicted probabilities classification. Conclusion: This research successfully established a machine learning-powered early warning system capable of real-time risk stratification for COVID-19-associated liver injury through dynamic integration of clinical data. The ensemble RF/ET-based models demonstrated significant clinical utility as decision support tools, particularly through their ability to identify high-risk patients requiring intensified monitoring and optimize hepatoprotective. By emphasizing drug-induced injury markers and disease progression process, ML models establish a personalized monitoring framework that could potentially transform clinical management for target patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.