ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Implementing a Near-Peer Mentorship Program to Enhance Surgical Research Among Medical Students: A Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Evaluation.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strength in Numbers: Leveraging Mentorship Teams to Support Medical Student Research in Turbulent Research Environments.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Research Mentorship for Undergraduate Medical Students in Low-Income Settings: A Perspective from Uganda.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Research is vital in medical education, fostering evidence-based practice and professional growth. However, medical students in low- and middle-income countries, such as Uganda, face significant barriers to research participation, including limited mentorship and resources. At Makerere University, these challenges impede surgical research output among students. Near-peer mentorship programs (NPMPs) offer a promising solution by leveraging senior students and residents to guide peers, enhancing research skills and productivity. This study implements and evaluates an NPMP within the Makerere University Surgery Society (MUSS) to boost student-led surgical research. Methods: A mixed-methods implementation research design, guided by the RE-AIM Framework, will assess the NPMP over 12 months at Makerere University College of Health Sciences. The program involves 120 participants: 15 surgical residents mentoring 30 senior students (Years 3-5), who mentor 75 junior students (Years 1-5). Convenience and purposive sampling will recruit participants. Quantitative data (surveys, logs) will measure reach, effectiveness (research output, competency), adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Qualitative interviews with 25 participants will explore feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability. Data analysis includes descriptive/inferential statistics and thematic analysis. This protocol has been approved by the Mulago Hospital Research and Ethics Committee (Protocol Approval Number MHREC 2931). Discussion: The NPMP aims to increase surgical research output, improve skills, and establish a sustainable mentorship culture within MUSS. By addressing mentorship gaps, it could enhance student engagement and offer a scalable model for resource-limited settings. Limitations include the lack of a control group and potential selection bias. This implementation research aims to establish a scalable model rather than prove direct causality in this initial phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.