Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969590›Full record

ArticleSchool mental health2025

The Role of Externalizing Problems and Empathy on the Daily Report Card.

Pevitr S Bansal, Jocelyn I Meza, Sara Chung, Laura N Henry, Melissa R Dvorsky, Lauren M Haack, Elizabeth B Owens, Linda J Pfiffner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in School mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pevitr S BansalDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7340-4215
Jocelyn I MezaDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-9099
Sara ChungDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4684-3164
Laura N HenryDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Melissa R DvorskyDivision of Psychology and Behavioral Health, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3790-1334
Lauren M HaackDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Elizabeth B OwensDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Linda J PfiffnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6589-6045

Funding

CLINICAL SERVICES RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32MH018261 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Kaja Zabrina LeWinn, Rachel L. Loewy · 1985 to 2026
$7.0M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The daily report card (DRC) is a commonly used behavioral intervention in which teachers rate child performance on target goals and parents provide home rewards based on the child's performance. The current study investigated associations between child externalizing problems, empathy, and specific components of the DRC: (1) types of DRC goals that are chosen, (2) teacher and parent adherence to the DRC, and (3) child performance on the DRC. These aims were examined in a sample of 71 children (ages 7-11) who were enrolled in a school-home intervention designed for children with significant inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive behaviors. Teachers and parents completed separate baseline measures of inattention (IA), hyperactivity/impulsivity (H/I), conduct problems (CP), and empathy. Outcomes included type of DRC goals (i.e., academic, behavioral, and social-emotional), teacher and parent adherence to the DRC during the initial four-week intervention period, and child DRC performance during the same period. First, IA predicted more academic goals but fewer social-emotional goals, H/I predicted fewer academic goals but more behavioral goals, and CP predicted more social-emotional goals. Second, H/I predicted better parental adherence such that parents rewarded their child's DRC more frequently. Third, baseline empathy predicted better overall DRC performance; externalizing problems did not negatively impact DRC performance. Results suggest that the DRC is a robust behavioral modification tool that can be tailored to fit each child's needs and severity of externalizing problems. Empathy may serve as an important factor when designing treatment protocols to improve overall child behavior.

Indexed as

adherenceattention problemsdaily report cardsempathyExternalizing problems

Identifiers

PMID40969590
PMCPMC12442852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.