Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969559›Full record

ArticleClimatic change2025

The attribution of human health outcomes to climate change: a transdisciplinary guidance document.

K Ebi, A Haines, R F S Andrade, C Åström, M L Barreto, A Bonell, N Brink, C Caminade, C J Carlson, R Carter and 51 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Climatic change, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

61 authors.

K EbiUniversity of Washington Center for Health and the Global Environment.
A HainesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
R F S AndradeCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Heath-Cidacs, FIOCRUZ.
C ÅströmUmeå University.
M L BarretoCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Heath-Cidacs, FIOCRUZ.
A BonellLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
N BrinkWits Planetary Health Research, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, and Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
C CaminadeThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics.
C J CarlsonYale University.
R CarterUniversity of Washington.
P ChuaThe University of Tokyo.
G Cissé(1) Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d'Ivoire (CSRS), (2) Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), (39 University of Basel (Unibasel).
F J Colón-GonzálezWellcome Trust.
S DasguptaFondazione CMCC.
L A GalvaoOswaldo Cruz Foundation - Fiocruz/CRIS.
M Garrido ZornozaInternational Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP).
A GasparriniLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
G Gordon-StrachanUniversity of the West Indies.
S HajatLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
S HarperUniversity of Alberta.
L J HarringtonTe Aka Mātuatua School of Science, University of Waikato, New Zealand.
M HashizumeThe University of Tokyo.
J HessUniversity of Washington.
J HillySchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales.
V IngoleOffice For National Statistics.
L V JacobsonFluminense Federal University.
T KapwataSouth African Medical Research Council.
C KeelerUniversity of Washington.
S A KiddCentre for Addiction and Mental Health/University of Toronto.
E W Kimani-MurageAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC).
R K KolliInternational Monsoons Project Office.
S KovatsLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
S LiThe University of Sheffield.
R LoweBarcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC-ICREA).
D MitchellUniversity of Bristol.
K MurrayMRC Unit The Gambia @ LSHTM.
M NewUniversity of Cape Town.
O E OgunniyiClimate Risk Laboratory, University of Cape Town.
S E Perkins-KirkpatrickFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University.
J PescariniLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; Oswaldo Cruz Foundation.
B L Pineda RestrepoOrganismo Andino de Salud-Convenio Hipólito Unanue.
S T R PinhoFederal University of Bahia.
V PrescottAustralian Intitute of Health and Welfare.
N RedversSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario.
S RyanUniversity of Florida.
B SanterWoods Hole Marine Biological Laboratory.
C-F SchleussnerInternational Institute for Applied System Analysis (IIASA).
J C SemenzaUmeå University.
M TaylorUniversity of the West Indies.
L TempleOxford Sustainable Law Programme, University of Oxford.
S ThiamAfrican Population and Health Research Center, West Africa Regional Office.
W ThieryVrije Universiteit Brussel.
A M TompkinsInternational Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP).
S UndorfPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK).
A M Vicedo-CabreraInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland // Oeschger Center for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
K WanLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
R WarrenTyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
C WebsterSouth African Medical Research Council and University of Pretoria.
A WoodwardUniversity of Auckland.
C WrightSouth African Medical Research Council.
R F Stuart-SmithOxford Sustainable Law Programme, University of Oxford, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V034162/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over 30 years, detection and attribution (D&A) studies have informed key conclusions in international and national assessments of climate science, providing compelling evidence for the reality and seriousness of the human effects on the global climate. In the early 21st century, D&A methods were adapted to assess the contribution of climate change to longer-term trends in earth system processes and extreme weather events. More recently, attribution research helped quantify the health and economic impacts of climate change. Here we provide guidance for transdisciplinary collaboration in designing, conducting, interpreting, and reporting robust and policy-relevant attribution analyses of human health outcomes. This guidance resulted from discussions among experts in health and climate science. Recommended steps include co-developing the research question across disciplines; establishing a transdisciplinary analytic team with fundamental grounding in the core disciplines; engaging meaningfully with relevant stakeholders and decision-makers to define an appropriate study design and analytic process, including defining the exposure event or trend; identifying, visualizing, and describing linkages in the causal pathway from exposure to weather/climate variables to the health outcome(s) of interest; choosing appropriate counterfactual climate data, and where applicable, to evaluate the skill of the climate and process or empirical health model(s) used in D&A research; quantifying the attributable changes in climate variables; quantifying the attributable health impacts within the context of other determinants of exposure and vulnerability; and reporting key results, including a description of how recommendations were incorporated into the analytical plan. Implementation of guidance would benefit diverse stakeholders including researchers, research funders, policymakers, and climate litigation by harmonizing methods and increasing confidence in findings.

Identifiers

PMID40969559
PMCPMC7618133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.