ArticleBulletin of volcanology2025
Capturing expert uncertainty: ICC-informed soft labelling for volcano-seismicity.
Article in Bulletin of volcanology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable classification of volcano-seismic signals underpins monitoring and eruption forecasting and is an essential tool for advancing understanding of subsurface processes. However, traditional approaches may overlook the inherent uncertainty and variability between expert judgments. We introduce an innovative method that explicitly quantifies inter-expert agreement using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and incorporates this measure into probabilistic, ICC-informed soft labels, which can be fed into machine learning pipelines. We conducted a global survey involving 89 experts who classified a set of 80 volcano-seismic events from Ruapehu, New Zealand, providing continuous ratings for standard categories: volcano tectonic (VT), hybrid (HYB), long-period (LP), and other (OT). ICC agreement scores revealed that single-rater scores produce poor agreement between experts even for well-established VT and LP classifications. However, reliability significantly improved for these classifications when multiple expert ratings were combined, although, for HYB and OT categories, expert disagreement remained substantial. We developed a soft labelling methodology that weights class probabilities by their respective ICC scores, resulting in a distribution that naturally reflects expert uncertainty. This demonstrates that ICC-informed soft labels could provide a robust alternative to the hard label standard by explicitly capturing classification uncertainty and variability. Our fully probabilistic view has the potential to significantly enhance machine learning model accuracy, robustness, and transferability across volcanic systems and should provide a fundamental shift in how volcano-seismic data are labelled and interpreted within automated monitoring frameworks. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00445-025-01875-4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.