Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969475›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Research on the construction of an evaluation index system of teachers' online learning power based on online professional learning communities.

Lei Xiang, Liumei Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lei XiangSchool of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China.
Liumei YuSchool of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In line with the overarching demands of the current educational ecological reform, online learning should transition from "novelty" to "normalization." Teachers in elementary and secondary schools are currently learning in an active style that stresses the development of learning power, gradually moving away from a passive form. The efficiency and effect of teachers' online learning are closely correlated with their level of online learning power. However, teachers' professional development is limited and there is a lack of direction at the practical level of online learning because there is no efficient evaluation index system for teachers' online learning power. Therefore, this study first conducts an in-depth study on the ELLI project learning power theory and the online learning power structure framework based on the attributes of the online professional learning communities (OPLCs), such as autonomy, professionalism, and openness. Methods: On this basis, research methods including the Delphi method, the Analytic Hierarchy Process, and the questionnaire survey method are employed to study the evaluation dimensions of teachers' online learning power. Establishing a scientific, logical, and operable index system for evaluating teachers' online learning power is the aim. The OPLCs-based evaluation index system of teachers' online learning power has been established following a series of studies that included the preliminary construction of the evaluation index system using the literature analysis method, the Delphi method for revision, the Analytic Hierarchy Process for determining the weights of each index item, and the questionnaire survey method for small-scale trial testing. Results: The evaluation index system consists of six first-level indicators and twenty-two second-level indicators. Furthermore, the evaluation index system's dimension division and weight distribution are reasonable, well-scientific, and reliable. Discussion: This research offers vital support and decision-making basis for effective diagnosis and precise improvement of teachers' online learning power, and puts forward new requirements and action guidelines for teachers' professional development.

Indexed as

evaluation index systemonline learning poweronline professional learning communitiesprofessional developmentteacher

Identifiers

PMID40969475
PMCPMC12440714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.