ArticleReproductive medicine and biology
Perspectives on Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders Among Japanese Patients With Hereditary Breast Cancer Undergoing Fertility Preservation: Insights From the First Japanese Survey.
Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drawing lines: how the public defines "Serious" genetic conditions for reproductive testing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Perspectives on Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders Among Japanese Patients With Hereditary Breast Cancer Undergoing Fertility Preservation: Insights From the First Japanese Survey.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) offers Methods: A questionnaire-based survey was administered to 264 patients with breast cancer who were eligible for oocyte or embryo cryopreservation at in vitro fertilization clinics between October 2024 and March 2025. A total of 161 valid responses were analyzed. The survey assessed Results: The uptake rate of Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of expanding reproductive options and patient awareness of PGT-M in the care of patients with hereditary cancer. Discussions should focus on how best to provide accurate information and enable informed reproductive choices for those at genetic risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.