ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Investigating Stoichiometric Controls of Nutrient Recycling in Rivers Using the Threespine Stickleback (
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigating Stoichiometric Controls of Nutrient Recycling in Rivers Using the Threespine Stickleback (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In freshwater ecosystems, fish play a critical role in regulating the standing stock and turnover rates of biologically important elements such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). They do so by assimilating dietary nutrients, storing them, and recycling a subset as liquid (excreta) or solid (egesta) waste. The elemental composition of fish diets, bodies and waste varies considerably both within and between species. However, the mechanistic link between intraspecific variation in particular traits, such as bone investment, and variation in waste elemental composition and release rates remains poorly understood. Using the framework of Ecological Stoichiometry, we investigate how phenotypic traits impact nutrient storage and recycling. The threespine stickleback serves as an ideal model because it has undergone significant phenotypic diversification following its relatively recent colonisation of freshwater environments. Specifically, we examine variation in P-rich bony armour along a river continuum, where estuarine sticklebacks are typically heavily armoured (fully plated), and freshwater sticklebacks have less armour (low plated). We collected sticklebacks from five sites along the Sooke River, ranging from the estuary to the upper reaches, and measured their excretion rates in the field. We quantified the P content of their bodies, diet, egesta and excreted wastes, and the N:P of their bodies and excreta. Our results revealed substantial variation in body P content (2.2%-5.9%), with fully plated fish exhibiting higher body %P and lower body N:P. Dietary P was highly variable, with fully plated fish showing marginally higher dietary %P. Notably, P excretion rates were positively correlated with body %P but not diet %P, suggesting that contrary to predictions, bone content may decrease P demand. This study demonstrates that differences in stickleback bone investment have led to meaningful differences in nutrient storage and recycling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.