ArticleFrontiers in allergy2025
Clinical characteristics of Netherton syndrome and exploration of targeted biologic therapy: two case reports.
Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Paediatric Uses of Dupilumab Beyond Approvals.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Netherton syndrome (NS) is a rare, autosomal recessive disease resulting from a mutation in the pathogenic variants in the Kazal type 5 (SPINK5) gene. In recent years, the targeted treatment of biological agents has increasingly emerged as a focal point of research. Case reports: We reported a 4-month-old child and 19-year-old female, both presenting with symptoms including erythema, scaling, and recurring episodes. Subsequently, genetic testing identified a defective SPINK5 gene, leading to a diagnosis of NS. The child received treatment with dupilumab, while the 19-year-old woman alternated between using dupilumab and secukinumab. Both patients had swift and enduring enhancement of skin lesions during the follow-up period. Conclusion: NS is an uncommon and frequently misdiagnosed hereditary dermatological disease. The management strategies for this condition are diverse, and no consensus exists. We implemented various biologic regimens for distinct patients, all demonstrating favorable outcomes and satisfactory tolerance. Besides, monitoring and evaluating the long-term safety of biologics in combination is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.