Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969187›Full record

ArticleACS agricultural science & technology2025

Assessment of Different Strategies for Composting of the Two-Phase Olive Mill Solid Waste: A Demonstrative Scale.

Sara Velilla-Delgado, Juan Cubero-Cardoso, Antonio Serrano, Elisabet Aranda, Concepción Calvo, Tatiana Robledo-Mahón

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS agricultural science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara Velilla-DelgadoEnvironmental Microbiology Group, Institute of Water Research, University of Granada, Espacio V Centenario, Avenida Madrid 11, 18012 Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2770-589X
Juan Cubero-CardosoEnvironmental Microbiology Group, Institute of Water Research, University of Granada, Espacio V Centenario, Avenida Madrid 11, 18012 Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4455-5417
Antonio SerranoEnvironmental Microbiology Group, Institute of Water Research, University of Granada, Espacio V Centenario, Avenida Madrid 11, 18012 Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4615-5038
Elisabet ArandaEnvironmental Microbiology Group, Institute of Water Research, University of Granada, Espacio V Centenario, Avenida Madrid 11, 18012 Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5915-2445
Concepción CalvoEnvironmental Microbiology Group, Institute of Water Research, University of Granada, Espacio V Centenario, Avenida Madrid 11, 18012 Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3252-3976
Tatiana Robledo-MahónEnvironmental Microbiology Group, Institute of Water Research, University of Granada, Espacio V Centenario, Avenida Madrid 11, 18012 Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5731-9619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thousands of tons of two-phase olive mill solid waste (2P-OMSW) are generated annually, necessitating effective valorization strategies. Composting has been widely explored as a management approach; however, the extended processing time required for these residues poses a significant challenge for the olive industry. In this study, a forced aeration system combined with a semipermeable cover was implemented at a demonstrative scale to enhance the composting process and reduce its duration. Additionally, process optimization was evaluated through a two-stage composting strategy. In stage I, compost preconditioning was carried out using two types of manure (poultry and cow). In stage II, a bioaugmentation process was introduced using the edible fungus

Indexed as

aerationalperujobioaugmentationbiodegradationmanurephenolic compoundsphytotoxicitysemipermeable membrane

Identifiers

PMID40969187
PMCPMC12442762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.