ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science
Effect of early tracheostomy for determining patient outcomes vis-a-vis late tracheostomy in severe stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and disability in India, and the hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) beds are limited. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to assess the effectiveness of early tracheostomy (ET) in reducing 30-day mortality in stroke patients, and secondary objectives included evaluating rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and length of ICU stay compared to late tracheostomy (LT). Methods: This open-label RCT was conducted over 18 months at a tertiary care hospital in north India, involving 60 patients (30 in each group). Eligible participants were adults (≥18 years) with nontraumatic stroke (acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and vasculitic infarcts) requiring prolonged intubation (stroke-related early tracheostomy score ≥8). Exclusions included preexisting pneumonia, high oxygen needs, pregnancy, and those on ventilation for over 4 days. Patients were assigned to ET (day 4) or LT (day 10), with demographics and clinical characteristics recorded. Mortality was assessed on day 30 postintubation and data for secondary outcomes were collected every other day. Results: Sixty-four patients were randomized, 30 to the ET group, and 34 to the LT group, with a mean age of 55.48 (±15.94) years. Mortality within 30 days was 50% in both groups. VAP rates were 43.3% in the ET group and 50% in the LT group ( Conclusion: The RCT found no significant differences in mortality or VAP rates but noted reduced ICU hospital stays for the ET group, suggesting benefits for severe stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.