Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969170›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Predicting pediatric diagnostic imaging patient no-show and extended wait-times using LLMs, regression, and tree based models.

Daniel Rafique, Xuan Liu, Bo Gong, Laura Belsito, Melissa D McCradden, Mjaye L Mazwi, Wayne Lee, Graham Ohanlon, Kyle Tsang, Manohar Shroff and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Daniel RafiqueDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Xuan LiuThe Hospital for Sick Children, Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Bo GongDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Laura BelsitoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Melissa D McCraddenAustralian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Mjaye L MazwiSeattle Children's Heart Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Wayne LeeThe Hospital for Sick Children, Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Graham OhanlonThe Hospital for Sick Children, Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kyle TsangThe Hospital for Sick Children, Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Manohar ShroffThe Hospital for Sick Children, Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Birgit Ertl-WagnerThe Hospital for Sick Children, Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Farzad KhalvatiDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patients missing their appointments (no-shows) are a persistent issue that results in idle resources while delaying critical patient prognosis. Likewise, long waiting times increase frustration for patients, leaving a negative impression on the appointment. In this paper, we explore 3 modalities of diagnostic and interventional radiology appointments for pediatric patients at the Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, ON, Canada. Our goal was to survey machine learning methods that best predict the risk of patient no-shows and long wait-times exceeding 1 hour for scheduling teams to propose targeted downstream accommodations. Methods: We experimented with 6 predictive model types separately trained on both tasks which included extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Artificial Neural Network, and a pre-trained large language model (LLM). Utilizing 20 features containing a mixture of patient demographics and appointment related data, we experimented with different data balancing methods including instance hardness threshold (IHT) and class weighting to reduce bias in prediction. We then conducted a comparative study of the improvements made by utilizing continuous contextual data in our LLM which boasted a 51% improvement in F1 score for the wait-time model. Results: Our XGBoost model had the best combination of AUC and F1 scores (0.96 and 0.62, respectively) for predicting no-show while RF had the best AUC and F1 scores (0.83 and 0.61, respectively) for wait-time prediction. The LLMs also performed well for 90% probability thresholds (high risk patients) while being robustly calibrated on unseen test data. Discussion: Our results surveyed multiple algorithms and data balancing methods to propose the greatest performing models on our tasks, implemented a unique methodology to use LLMs on heterogeneous data within this domain, and demonstrated the greater importance of contextual appointment data over patient demographic features for a more equitable prediction algorithm. Going forward, the predictive output (calibrated probabilities of events) can be used as stochastic input for risk-based optimized scheduling to provide accommodation for patients less likely to receive quality access to healthcare.

Indexed as

calibrationdata balancinglarge language modelmachine learningno-showpredictionschedulingwait-times

Identifiers

PMID40969170
PMCPMC12441020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.