ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
An AI-powered framework for assessing teacher performance in classroom interactions: a deep learning approach.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence and teacher competence: a scoping review of assessment, analytics, and professional development.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Teacher performance evaluation is essential for improving instructional quality and guiding professional development, yet traditional observation-based methods can be subjective, labor-intensive, and inconsistently reliable. This study proposes an AI-powered framework to objectively assess classroom interactions. Methods: We developed and evaluated a computer-vision framework using three state-of-the-art object detectors-YOLOv8, Faster R-CNN, and RetinaNet-to identify eleven classroom interaction categories. A labeled dataset of 7,259 images collected from real classroom settings was annotated and used for training and evaluation. Performance was assessed using mean Average Precision (mAP). Results: YOLOv8 achieved the best performance among the evaluated models, with an mAP of 85.8%, indicating strong accuracy in detecting diverse classroom interactions. Faster R-CNN and RetinaNet performed competitively but were outperformed by YOLOv8. Discussion/Conclusion: The results demonstrate that modern deep learning-based detection can provide more objective and reliable insights into teacher-student interactions than traditional approaches. The proposed framework supports evidence-based evaluation and has the potential to enhance feedback and outcomes in educational practice.].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.