Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969159›Full record

ArticleChemical science2025

Xiyue Leng, Katherine I Albanese, Lia R Golub, Arthur A Norman, Jonathan Clayden, Derek N Woolfson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiyue LengSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol Cantock's Close Bristol BS8 1TS UK D.N.Woolfson@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4441-2352
Katherine I AlbaneseSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol Cantock's Close Bristol BS8 1TS UK D.N.Woolfson@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2336-1621
Lia R GolubSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol Cantock's Close Bristol BS8 1TS UK D.N.Woolfson@bristol.ac.uk.
Arthur A NormanSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol Medical Sciences Building, University Walk Bristol BS8 1TD UK.
Jonathan ClaydenSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol Cantock's Close Bristol BS8 1TS UK D.N.Woolfson@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5080-9535
Derek N WoolfsonSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol Cantock's Close Bristol BS8 1TS UK D.N.Woolfson@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-3202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational protein design is advancing rapidly. However, approaches and methods are needed to increase success rates and to elaborate designs. Here we describe the combination of rational and computational design to deliver three-helix bundle (3HB) peptide assemblies and single-chain proteins with control over topology and thermal stability. First, we garner sequence-to-structure relationships from antiparallel 3HBs in the Protein Data Bank. This gives core-packing rules, including layers of hydrogen-bonded polar residues, which are combined with surface-charge patterning to design complementary sequences for acidic (A), basic (B), and neutral (N) helices. By altering the design of the N helix, two sets of synthetic peptides are generated for clockwise and anticlockwise arrangements of the three-helix assemblies. Solution-phase characterisation shows that both ABN peptide mixtures form stable, heterotrimeric assemblies consistent with the targeted 'up-down-up' topologies. Next, AlphaFold2 models for both designs are used to seed computational designs of single-chain proteins where the helices are connected by loop building. Synthetic genes for these express in

Identifiers

PMID40969159
PMCPMC12441935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.