Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969138›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2025

Specimen Inactivation Methods for Proteomics─Comparisons of Irradiation, Chemical, and Heat Treatments on Downstream Serum Analyses.

Brooke N Genovese, Nistara Randhawa, Gabriela Grigorean, Tracy Drazenovich, Brett S Phinney, Koen K A Van Rompay, JoAnn Yee, Jonna A K Mazet, Brian H Bird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brooke N GenoveseOne Health Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8110-1174
Nistara RandhawaGrand Challenges, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Gabriela GrigoreanGenome & Biomedical Sciences Facility, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Tracy DrazenovichOne Health Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Brett S PhinneyGenome & Biomedical Sciences Facility, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3870-3302
Koen K A Van RompayCalifornia National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.
JoAnn YeeCalifornia National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Jonna A K MazetOne Health Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8712-5951
Brian H BirdOne Health Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.

Funding

National Institute on Aging (NIA) ColonyP51OD011107 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Simon J. Atkinson · 2012 to 2026
$191.5M
NIH HHS P51 OD011107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiomic techniques, including proteomics, can provide novel insights for both pathogen detection and assessment of host responses to infection. Numerous studies have described the efficacy of heat inactivation, γ irradiation, or treatment with guanidinium-based chaotropic salts (e.g., TRIzol) for pathogen inactivation of biological samples to ensure biosafety and biosecurity. However, the effect of these methods on the greater serum proteome is less studied. Here, we sought to comprehensively measure the effects of four routinely used pathogen inactivation methods on the serum proteome of Rhesus macaques by characterizing the serum proteome pre-and-post inactivation treatment. Using the R-package MS-DAP for statistical benchmarking, our analysis revealed distinct changes in total peptide/protein detection and individual protein abundances (e.g., ALB, APOA1, and CRP) across inactivation methods and compared to their untreated controls. Specifically, we observed improved quantitative reproducibility in γ-irradiated samples across biological, technical, and experimental replicates compared to chemical inactivation and different heat combinations. These findings represent the first direct, experimental comparisons of effective pathogen inactivation methods on the serologic profiles of nonhuman primates and provide useful criteria for evaluating methods for biological specimen inactivation prior to proteomic analysis.

Indexed as

Blood ProteinsProteomeProteomicsSpecimen HandlingAnimalsGamma RaysHot TemperatureMacaca mulattaReproducibility of ResultsBlood ProteinsProteomeDIAgamma irradiationinactivationLCMSMS-DAPproteomicsserum proteinTRIzol

Identifiers

PMID40969138
PMCPMC12501927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.