ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An EMG-Based GRU Model for Estimating Foot Pressure to Support Active Ankle Orthosis Development.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning Models Optimization for Gait Phase Identification from EMG Data During Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As populations age, particularly in countries like Japan, mobility impairments related to ankle joint dysfunction, such as foot drop, instability, and reduced gait adaptability, have become a significant concern. Active ankle-foot orthoses (AAFO) offer targeted support during walking; however, most existing systems rely on rule-based or threshold-based control, which are often limited to sagittal plane movements and lacking adaptability to subject-specific gait variations. This study proposes an approach driven by neuromuscular activation using surface electromyography (EMG) and a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU)-based deep learning model to predict plantar pressure distributions at the heel, midfoot, and toe regions during gait. EMG signals were collected from four key ankle muscles, and plantar pressures were recorded using a customized sandal-integrated force-sensitive resistor (FSR) system. The data underwent comprehensive preprocessing and segmentation using a sliding window method. Root mean square (RMS) values were extracted as the primary input feature due to their consistent performance in capturing muscle activation intensity. The GRU model successfully generalized across subjects, enabling the accurate real-time inference of critical gait events such as heel strike, mid-stance, and toe off. This biomechanical evaluation demonstrated strong signal compatibility, while also identifying individual variations in electromechanical delay (EMD). The proposed predictive framework offers a scalable and interpretable approach to improving real-time AAFO control by synchronizing assistance with user-specific gait dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.